|
DEMOGRAPHICS
|
|
|
BHJ AREA |
2010 |
2000 |
# Change |
| Brooke |
24,069 |
25,447 |
-1,378 |
| Hancock |
30,676 |
32,667 |
-1,991 |
| Jefferson |
69,709 |
73,894 |
-4,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BROOKE & HANCOCK |
2010 |
2000 |
# Change |
| |
Total population |
Total population |
|
| Beech Bottom village |
523 |
606 |
-83 |
| Bethany town |
1036 |
985 |
51 |
| Chester city |
2585 |
2592 |
-7 |
| Follansbee city |
2986 |
3115 |
-129 |
| Hooverson Heights CDP |
2590 |
2909 |
-319 |
| New Cumberland city |
1103 |
1099 |
4 |
| Newell CDP |
1376 |
1602 |
-226 |
| Weirton city |
19746 |
20411 |
-665 |
| Wellsburg city |
2805 |
2891 |
-86 |
| Windsor Heights village |
423 |
431 |
-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JEFFERSON |
2010 |
2000 |
# Change |
|
Total population |
Total population |
|
| Adena village |
759 |
815 |
-56 |
| Amsterdam village |
511 |
568 |
-57 |
| Bergholz village |
664 |
769 |
-105 |
| Bloomingdale village |
202 |
221 |
-19 |
| Brilliant CDP |
1,482 |
|
NA |
| Dillonvale village |
665 |
781 |
-116 |
| Empire village |
299 |
300 |
-1 |
| Irondale village |
387 |
418 |
-31 |
| Mingo Junction village |
3,454 |
3631 |
-177 |
| Mount Pleasant village |
478 |
535 |
-57 |
| New Alexandria village |
272 |
222 |
50 |
| Pottery Addition CDP |
293 |
|
NA |
| Rayland village |
417 |
434 |
-17 |
| Richmond village |
481 |
471 |
10 |
| Smithfield village |
869 |
867 |
2 |
| Steubenville city |
18,659
|
19015 |
-356 |
| Stratton |
294 |
277 |
17 |
| Tiltonsville |
1,372 |
1329 |
43 |
| Toronto city |
5,091 |
5676 |
-585 |
| Wintersville
village |
3,924 |
4067 |
-143 |
| Yorkville village |
1,079 |
1230 |
-151 |
|
|
|
|
Planned Release Date1
|
Data Products
|
Lowest Level Geography
|
|
States:
JUN 2011 – AUG 2011
|
- Population counts for 63 race categories and
Hispanic or Latino ……….........................
- Population counts for many detailed race and
Hispanic or Latino categories, and American Indian
and Alaska Native
tribes……………………….....................................................
- Selected population and housing
characteristics………………..……..............................
|
Blocks
Census Tracts
Blocks/Census Tracts
|
Urban/Rural Update:
OCT 2012 |
Urban/Rural Update: 3
- Addition of urban and rural population and
housing unit counts …………............................
- Addition of characteristics for urbanized areas
and urban clusters ……………....................
|
Blocks
Urban Clusters
|
|
States:
DEC 2011 – APR 2012
|
Summary File 2 (SF 2):
- Population and housing characteristics iterated
for many detailed race and Hispanic or Latino
categories, and American Indian and Alaska Native
tribes
|
Census Tracts
|
Urban/Rural Update:
JAN 2013 |
Urban/Rural Update:
- Addition of urban and rural population and
housing unit counts ………….....................…..
- Addition of characteristics for urbanized areas
and urban clusters ……….................……..
|
Census Tracts
Urban Clusters
|
| MAY 2012 – DEC 2012
|
Summary Population and Housing Characteristics
Report Series
- Data tables on age, sex, race, Hispanic origin,
households, families, housing tenure and occupancy,
population density, and area measurements
- Reports for each state, the District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico; and a U.S. Summary
- Similar to the Census 2000 PHC-1 report series
|
Places |
| APR 2013 – SEP 2013 |
Population and Housing Unit Counts Report Series
- Data tables providing selected historical
population and housing unit counts
- Includes tables on population density and area
measurements
- Reports for each state, the District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico; and a U.S. Summary
- Similar to the Census 2000 PHC-3 report series
|
Places |
|
JAN 2013
(and every 2 years thereafter for states where
redistricting occurs)
|
Congressional District Summary File (113th Congress)
- Retabulation of Summary File 1 for newly
redistricted Congressional Districts (113th
Congress)
|
Census Tracts within
Congressional Districts |
JUN 2013
(and every 2 years thereafter for
states where redistricting occurs) |
State Legislative District Summary File
- Retabulation of Summary File 1 for State
Legislative Districts drawn following the 2010
Census
|
Places
|
|
Legislative District Geographic Supplement
- Files containing current geographic attributes
for blocks within State Legislative Districts
- No characteristics – only total population and
housing unit counts
|
Blocks
|
| APR 2013 |
Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska
Natives by Tribe Report
- Population and housing characteristics for
selected American Indian and Alaska Native tribes
- Similar to the Census 2000 PHC-5 report, but
only for 100-percent data
|
States |
December 2010
By law, the Census Bureau delivers population information to
the President for apportionment
March 2011
By law, the Census Bureau completes delivery of redistricting
data to states
| BROOKE |
2000 |
2010 |
HANCOCK |
2000 |
2010 |
JEFFERSON |
2000 |
2010 |
|
Beech Bottom |
67% |
62% |
Chester |
63% |
66% |
Adena |
73% |
76% |
|
Bethany |
89% |
69% |
New Cumberland |
66% |
77% |
Amsterdam |
75% |
77% |
|
Follansbee |
79% |
74% |
Weirton |
80% |
74% |
Bergholz
|
71% |
61% |
|
Wellsburg |
80% |
71% |
|
|
|
Dillionvale
|
69% |
71% |
|
Windsor Heights |
79% |
62% |
|
|
|
Irondale |
57% |
57% |
Take 10 minutes to fill out your 2010 Census form and
mail it back TODAY. If 100% of households mailed back
their forms, taxpayers would save $1.5 BILLION dollars.
Let's all do our part and mail back our forms!
2010 Census National Participation Rate:
72%
The Mail Participation Rate is the
percentage of forms mailed back by households that received
them. The Census Bureau developed this new measure in 2010,
in part because of the current economy and higher rates of
vacant housing. The rate excludes households whose forms
were returned to us by the U.S. Postal Service as
“undeliverable,” strongly suggesting the house was vacant.
We will still follow up on all these housing units to ensure
everyone is counted.
Mail Participation Rate is a higher
number than the Mail Response Rate we have
used over the last decade, but it is a better measure of
actual participation and therefore an easier goal to achieve
when residents mail back their forms. In 2000, the
national Mail Response Rate was 67% and the
comparable national Mail Participation Rate
was 72%. The Mail Response Rate is important to help us plan
for the important door-to-door workload that begins in May
during which we visit all households that have not returned
a census form
* The rates displayed are the rates achieved by Tuesday,
April 27, 2010, prior to the cut-off for door-to-door non
response follow-up operations. Final rates will be posted in
the fall and will include late mail returns
|
New Alexandaria
|
78% |
74% |
|
Mingo |
78% |
72% |
|
Mt Pleasant
|
64% |
64% |
|
Rayland
|
74% |
70% |
|
Richmond |
69% |
72% |
|
Smithfield
|
62% |
59%
|
|
Steubenville |
74% |
70% |
|
Tiltonsville
|
84% |
75% |
|
Toronto |
82% |
78% |
|
Yorkville |
76% |
72% |
|
Wintersville
|
83% |
78% |
|
|